King v. W. W. Grainger Inc.

Filing 137

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; Motions terminated: 109 MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Response (Doc #100) to Defendant's Reply In Support of Its Motion to Set Aside Jury Trial Setting filed by W. W. Grainger Inc ., 124 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 109 MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Response (Doc #100) to Defendant's Reply In Support of Its Motion to Set Aside Jury Trial Setting filed by W. W. Grainger Inc., 87 MOTION to Set Aside <I, 87 MOTION to Set Aside Jury Trial Setting filed by W. W. Grainger Inc..; denying 87 Motion to Set Aside ; granting 109 Motion to Strike ; adopting Report and Recommendations re 124 Report and Recommendations.. Signed by W. Allen Pepper on 10/18/2011. (pls)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
DELTA DIVISION

MICHAEL ANTHONY KING
v.

PLAINTIFF
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11CV00016-WAP-JMV

W. W. GRAINGER, INC.

DEFENDANT

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
On consideration of the file and record of this action, the court finds that the Report and
Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated September 15, 2011, was on that
date duly served upon the parties; that more than fourteen days have elapsed since service of said
Report and Recommendation; and that no objection thereto has been filed or served by any party.
The court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation should be
approved and adopted as the opinion of the court. It is, therefore
ORDERED:
1. That the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated
September 15, 2011, is hereby approved and adopted as the opinion of the court.
2. That the defendant’s Motion to Set Aside Jury Trial Setting (# 87) is hereby DENIED
and that the Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Reply in Support of It’s
Motion to Set Aside Jury Trial Setting (# 109) is GRANTED.
THIS, the 18th day of October, 2011.
/s/ W. Allen Pepper, Jr.
W. ALLEN PEPPER, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE