Green v. Faurecia Automotive Seating, Inc.
Filing
28
ORDER granting 26 Motion to Stay. Signed by Jane M Virden on 12/5/11. (ncb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
DELTA DIVISION
FERNANDO GREEN
V.
PLAINTIFF
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:11-cv-173-MPM-JMV
FAURECIA AUTOMOTIVE SEATING, INC.
DEFENDANT
ORDER STAYING PROCEEDINGS PENDING RULING
ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO COMPEL BINDING ARBITRATION
This cause is before the Court on the Motion (# 26) of Defendant Faurecia Automotive
Seating, Inc. to stay all proceedings pending a ruling on the Motion to Dismiss and to Compel
Binding Arbitration. Having considered the motion, the Court finds it to be well-taken.
Wherefore, premises considered, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1) Disclosure requirements, discovery, and all proceedings not related to Faurecia’s
Motion to Dismiss and to Compel Binding Arbitration are stayed pending a ruling on
said motion;
2) Faurecia does not have to respond to the discovery propounded by Plaintiff, including
Requests for Admissions; and
3) In the event Faurecia’s Motion to Dismiss and to Compel Binding Arbitration is
denied, counsel for Faurecia shall contact the undersigned within ten (10) days of the
filing of such order to schedule a telephonic case management conference during
which new deadlines, as well as deadlines for Faurecia to respond to Plaintiff’s
Interrogatories, Request for Production and Request for Admissions, will be
established. Counsel for Faurecia shall also submit a proposed order lifting the stay
within this time period.
SO ORDERED, this the 5th day of December, 2011.
/s/ Jane M. Virden_____________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?