Rideout v. Allstate Insurance, Inc.

Filing 45

ORDER denying 30 Motion to Compel. Signed by Jane M Virden on 10/17/12. (ncb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI DELTA DIVISION PAMELA RIDEOUT VERSUS PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. : 2:11CV222-MPM-JMV ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY DEFENDANT ORDER Consistent with the court’s oral ruling during a telephonic hearing in this matter on this date, Allstate’s motion to compel return of document(s) [# 30] is DENIED. It should be reiterated that the court does not believe the instant motion is the appropriate vehicle for the relief sought by Allstate, i.e., an order compelling the return of the original and all copies of a document(s) Plaintiff obtained during her employ with Allstate and prior to the filing of this lawsuit. However, to the extent that Plaintiff will seek to use the subject document(s) in this lawsuit, the court will entertain a motion for protective order or any other appropriate request under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. SO ORDERED this 17th day of October, 2012. /s/ Jane M. Virden U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?