Rideout v. Allstate Insurance, Inc.
Filing
45
ORDER denying 30 Motion to Compel. Signed by Jane M Virden on 10/17/12. (ncb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
DELTA DIVISION
PAMELA RIDEOUT
VERSUS
PLAINTIFF
CIVIL ACTION NO. : 2:11CV222-MPM-JMV
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
DEFENDANT
ORDER
Consistent with the court’s oral ruling during a telephonic hearing in this matter on this
date, Allstate’s motion to compel return of document(s) [# 30] is DENIED. It should be
reiterated that the court does not believe the instant motion is the appropriate vehicle for the
relief sought by Allstate, i.e., an order compelling the return of the original and all copies of a
document(s) Plaintiff obtained during her employ with Allstate and prior to the filing of this
lawsuit. However, to the extent that Plaintiff will seek to use the subject document(s) in this
lawsuit, the court will entertain a motion for protective order or any other appropriate request
under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
SO ORDERED this 17th day of October, 2012.
/s/ Jane M. Virden
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?