Rideout v. Allstate Insurance, Inc.

Filing 75

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 68 Motion to Compel. Signed by Jane M Virden on 4/30/13. (ncb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
DELTA DIVISION
PAMELA RIDEOUT
VERSUS

PLAINTIFF
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:11CV222-MPM-JMV

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY

DEFENDANT
ORDER

Consistent with the court’s ruling this date from the bench on Plaintiff’s Emergency
Motion to Compel 30(b)(6) Deposition Testimony [68], it is
THEREFORE, ORDERED:
1.

That the Motion is granted in part and denied in part.

2. That Defendant’s objections are sustained with respect to the following deposition
topics, and Plaintiff may not explore them during the deposition: No. 1, No. 2
(second one), and No. 20.
3. That Defendant has already provided testimony on the following topics and will
stipulate that said testimony is binding corporate testimony under Rule 30(b)(6);
however, Plaintiff may ask questions that have not already been asked and answered
with regard to said topics, and Defendant will provide corporate designees to cover
them: No. 2 (first one), No. 3, No. 4, No. 8, No. 13, No. 14, No. 16, Revised No. 17,
No. 18, No. 19, and No. 21(a).
4. That topic No. 23 shall be included with and treated the same as those listed in 3
above, except that questions shall be limited to the relevant time period and limited to
those persons Plaintiff contends are comparators.

-1-

5. That the discovery deadline is extended to 6/15/13, and the motions deadline is
extended to 7/15/13.
6. That on or before May 10, 2013, Plaintiff shall provide Defendant with a list of
stipulation deposition topics about which she does not intend to ask further questions.
SO ORDERED this 30th day of April, 2013.

/s/ Jane M. Virden
U. S. Magistrate Judge

-2-