Jones v. The City of Rosedale

Filing 22

ORDER denying 21 Motion for an Order for a Rule 35 examination. Signed by Jane M Virden on 7/24/12. (ncb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI DELTA DIVISION LA TIDTUS JONES PLAINTIFF V. NO. 2:12CV00032-SA-JMV THE CITY OF ROSEDALE DEFENDANT ORDER Before the court is the pro se prisoner plaintiff’s second motion [21] for a physical examination pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 35. Specifically, Plaintiff seeks an order requiring that either the Bolivar County Regional Correctional Facility or the Mississippi Department of Corrections produce him for an examination–including MRI’s and CAT scans–for the purpose of “determination of the scope of” injuries to his right hand and right shoulder. Said alleged injuries are allegedly the result of the “assault” which makes the basis of Plaintiff’s complaint. By Order [13] dated May 16, 2012, this court denied Plaintiff’s first motion [12] for a Rule 35 examination as premature on the grounds that a Spears hearing had not yet been conducted and the defendants had not been called upon to answer the complaint. Now, considering that a Report and Recommendation for dismissal of this case is pending and process has not been issued for any defendant, the instant motion should likewise be, and is hereby, DENIED as premature. This 24th day of July, 2012. /s/ Jane M. Virden U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?