Jones v. The City of Rosedale
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; case DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted; counting as a "strike"; motion 28 DISMISSED as moot; CASE CLOSED. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 12/12/12. (cr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
LA TIDTUS JONES
CITY OF ROSEDALE, ET AL.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Upon consideration of the file and records in this action, the court finds that the Report
and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated June 13, 2012, was on that
date duly served by mail upon the pro se plaintiff at his last known address; that more than
fourteen days have elapsed since service of the Report and Recommendation; and that no
objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed or served by any party. The court is
of the opinion that the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation should be approved and
adopted as the opinion of the court. It is, therefore ORDERED:
That the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated
June 13, 2012, is hereby APPROVED AND ADOPTED as the opinion of the court.
That the instant case is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a
claim upon which relief could be granted, counting as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915
(e)(2)(B)(i) and 1915(g).
That, in light of this ruling, the plaintiff’s motion  for writ of mandamus and
motion  requesting physical exam are DISMISSED as moot.
That this case is CLOSED.
SO ORDERED, THIS the 12th day of December, 2012.
/s/ Sharion Aycock
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?