Tutor et al v. Pontotoc County et al

Filing 177

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 175 Motion to Strike the reply to the response to the March 13, 2009 motion for summary judgment or in the alternative for permission to file a surrebuttal memorandum. Signed by Michael P. Mills on 3/31/09. (lpm, USDC)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI WESTERN DIVISION JACOB RYAN TUTOR BY AND THROUGH HIS NEXT FRIEND TERRI ESTES, JOSHUA SEAN TUTOR BY AND THROUGH HIS NEXT FRIEND TERRI ESTES, JOHN THOMAS TUTOR BY AND THROUGH HIS NEXT FRIEND TERRI ESTES, ALMA REGINA TUTOR INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF JAMES STEVENSON V. PONTOTOC COUNTY, SHERRIF LEO MASK, BUDDY EUBANKS, SHEILA LUNN, R.N. PATRICIA PARKS, M.D. ORDER This cause comes before the court on the motion [175] of the plaintiffs to strike the reply to the response to the March 13, 2009 motion for summary judgement or in the alternative for permission to file a surrebuttal memorandum. The plaintiffs seek to strike this document because it raises the issue of causation which was not addressed in the initial motion for summary judgment. This court agrees that all grounds for summary judgment should be raised in an initial motion. However, striking the document would not best serve the interests of justice. The better cure is to allow surrebuttal. This solution allows the court to seek the truth in making its decision and allows the plaintiffs to present all valid arguments. The plaintiffs shall have 5 days from the entry of this order to file a surrebuttal memorandum. The plaintiffs' motion to strike or in the alternative for surrebuttal is GRANTED IN PLAINTIFFS CASE NO. 3:08CV16 DEFENDANTS PART and DENIED IN PART. This the 31st day of March, 2009. /s/ MICHAEL P. MILLS CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?