Wheat v. Strickland et al
Filing
136
CONSENT JUDGMENT in favor of Frances Z. Wheat against John Howard Strickland, Jr. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 3/10/2015. Associated Cases: 3:13-cv-00087-SA-DAS, 3:13-cv-00088-SA-DAS (bkl)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
OXFORD DIVISION
FRANCES Z. WHEAT, AS PERSONAL
REPRESENTATIVE AND FOR/ON BEHALF
OF THE ESTATE AND WRONGFUL DEATH
BENEFICIARIES OF SARAH KATHERINE
WHEAT, DECEASED
V.
PLAINTIFF
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:13-CV-00087-SA-DAS
LEAD CASE
JOHN HOWARD STRICKLAND, JR.,
JOHN HOWARD STRICKLAND and
JENNIFER STRICKLAND
DEFENDANTS
CONSOLIDATED WITH
FRANCES Z. WHEAT, AS PERSONAL
REPRESENTATIVE AND FOR/ON BEHALF
OF THE ESTATE AND WRONGFUL DEATH
BENEFICIARIES OF JOHN WILLIAM
WHEAT, DECEASED
V.
PLAINTIFF
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:13-CV-00088-SA-DAS
JOHN HOWARD STRICKLAND, JR.,
JOHN HOWARD STRICKLAND and
JENNIFER STRICKLAND
DEFENDANTS
CONSENT JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, Frances Z. Wheat as Personal Representative and For/On Behalf of the Estates
and Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Sarah Katherine Wheat, Deceased and John William
Wheat, Deceased (“Plaintiffs”) have agreed to a settlement of this action as to Defendant John
Howard Strickland, Jr. (“Defendant JR Strickland”) only, that includes the entry of this Consent
Judgment.
A.
CASE BACKGROUND AND COURT PROCEEDINGS
1.
On February 12, 2013, Plaintiffs filed two Complaints in the Circuit Court of
Lafayette County, Mississippi styled Frances Z. Wheat, as personal representative, and for/on
behalf of the Estate and Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Sarah Katherine Wheat, Deceased,
Civil Action No. L13-045; and Frances Z. Wheat, as personal representative, and for/on behalf
of the Estate and Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of John William Wheat, Deceased, Civil Action
No. L13-046.
2.
On February 12, 2013, Defendant JR Strickland filed his Separate Answers and
Objections to each Complaint.
3.
Both lawsuits were removed to this Court on March 29, 2013, and were ultimately
consolidated in this cause of action.
4.
On December 16, 2014, Defendant JR Strickland moved this Court for Leave to
file Amended Answers. The Court granted the motion on January 12, 2015 and Defendant JR
Strickland filed his Amended Answers on January 13, 2015.
5.
In their Complaints, Plaintiffs have alleged claims against Defendant JR
Strickland for Negligence, Negligence per se, and Wrongful Deaths of John William Wheat and
Sarah Katherine Wheat (“John and Sarah Wheat). John and Sarah Wheat were killed in an
automobile accident on October 27, 2012 when Defendant JR Strickland was operating his
vehicle under the influence of illegal substances and was impaired to such a point that he lost
consciousness, lost control of his vehicle, crossed the median in the west bound lane of traffic
and struck the vehicle driven by John William Wheat head on. Both Sarah Katherine Wheat and
John William Wheat died as a result of the injuries sustained in the wreck.
2
6.
The toxicology report indicated that Defendant JR Strickland was under the
influence of marijuana, Prozac, Valium and had been “huffing” from air duster cans before the
collision. Law enforcement at the scene found an aerosol spray can of the air duster in his
vehicle. Later, a receipt was recovered showing that he had purchased the can of air duster the
day of the collision.
7.
Defendant JR Strickland was indicted on two criminal charges of aggravated DUI
in the Criminal Court of Lafayette County, Mississippi. He admitted generally the facts as stated
above in a guilty plea agreement proceeding wherein Defendant JR Strickland pled guilty to one
charge of aggravated DUI. He was convicted and sentenced to prison for 25 years (commuted to
12 years) at the Mississippi State Prison in Parchman, Mississippi.
8.
Defendant JR Strickland was ordered by the Criminal Court of Lafayette County,
Mississippi to pay restitution in the amount of $86,142.16 for medical expenses and funeral costs
incurred by the Plaintiffs as a result of the injuries sustained by and the subsequent deaths of
John and Sarah Wheat.
9.
Defendant JR Strickland has admitted his liability for causing the deaths of John
and Sarah Wheat in the instant matter before this Court.
10.
Plaintiffs and Defendant JR Strickland have advised the Court of their agreement
to settle and dismiss this action as to the Plaintiffs claims against Defendant JR Strickland and
have provided for the Court’s consideration the Settlement Agreement and Release of Claims
(“Settlement Agreement”) between Plaintiffs and Defendant JR Strickland.
3
B.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1441, this matter was removed to this Court from the
Circuit Court of Lafayette County, Mississippi, based upon 28 U.S.C. § 1332, Diversity of
Citizenship.
2.
Venue is proper in this judicial district because the actions alleged in the
Complaints were alleged to have occurred in Oxford, Mississippi which is within the Northern
District of Mississippi.
C.
CONSENT JUDGMENT
Defendant JR Strickland consents to a Judgment against him in the amount of Eight
Hundred Sixty-Three Thousand, Eight Hundred Fifty-Seven Dollars and 84/100ths.
($863,857.84.) This amount represents a settlement of $950,000 less the $86,142.16 he has been
ordered to pay in restitution. It is therefore ORDERED that the Clerk enter a judgment against
Defendant JR Strickland in favor of the Plaintiffs in the amount of Eight Hundred Sixty-Three
Thousand, Eight Hundred Fifty-Seven Dollars and 84/100ths ($863,857.84).
D.
DISMISSAL, COSTS AND ATTORNEYS’ FEES
1.
The entry of this Consent Judgment will operate as a Dismissal with Prejudice of
all claims Plaintiffs have against Defendant JR Strickland in this action, including all claims
asserted or which may have been asserted against him in this action. It is hereby ORDERED that
all claims alleged in this action against Defendant JR Strickland are dismissed WITH
PREJUDICE.
4
2.
Plaintiffs and Defendant JR Strickland shall each bear their own costs and
attorneys’ fees incurred in this case.
E.
RETENTION OF JURISDICTION
This Court shall retain jurisdiction of this Consent Judgment for the purposes of resolving
any disputes arising under this Consent Judgment, entering Orders modifying, or satisfying all or
a portion of this Consent Judgment consistent with the Settlement Agreement, or effectuating or
enforcing compliance with the terms of this Consent Judgment.
F.
FINAL JUDGMENT
Upon approval and entry of this Consent Judgment, this Consent Judgment shall
constitute the final judgment in this action as to the claims between Plaintiffs and Defendant JR
Strickland. This final judgment is not dischargeable in Bankruptcy pursuant to an agreement of
the parties and 11 U.S.C. Section 523(a)(9). This judgment shall accrue interest pursuant 28
U.S.C. Section 1961, and shall be “calculated from the date of the entry of the judgment, at a rate
equal to the weekly average 1-year constant maturity Treasury yield, as published by the Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, for the calendar week preceding the date of the
judgment.”
IT IS SO ORDERED, this the 10th day of March, 2015.
/s/ Sharion Aycock
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
5
CONSENTED TO AND APPROVED BY:
/s/ J. Rhea Tannehill, Jr.
J. RHEA TANNEHILL, JR.. (MS BAR NO.: 10449)
JACOB B. JORDAN (MS BAR NO. (MS BAR NO.: 104230)
TANNEHILL, CARMEAN & McKENZIE, PLLC
829 North Lamar Boulevard, Suite 1
Oxford, Mississippi 38655
Telephone: (662) 236-9996
jrt@tannehillcarmean.com
jacob@tannehillcarmean.com
C. JAMES ZESZUTEK (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
DINSMORE & SHOHL
One Oxford Centre
301 Grant Street, Suite 2800
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219
Telephone: (412) 288-5863
james.zeszutek@dinsmore.com
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS
/s/ John Howard Strickland, Jr.
JOHN HOWARD STRICKLAND, JR.
/s/ James M. Simpson
JAMES M. SIMPSON, (MS BAR NO.: 103823)
ALLEN, SUMMERS, SIMPSON, LILLIE & GRESHAM, PLLC
80 Monroe Avenue, Suite 650
Memphis, Tennessee 38103
901-763-4200
jsimpson@allensummers.com
ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT JOHN HOWARD STRICKLAND, JR.
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?