Martz v. Mississippi Army National Guard
Filing
7
ORDER STAYING CASE pending a ruling on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 4 . Signed by Jane M Virden on 5/20/13. (ncb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
OXFORD DIVISION
MICHAEL REED MARTZ
PLAINTIFF
v.
CASE NO. 3:13cv114-NBB-JMV
MISSISSIPPI ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
DEFENDANT
MISS. UNIF. CIV. L. R. 16(b)(3)(B) & (C)
ORDER STAYING CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS PENDING RULING ON DEFENDANT
MISSISSIPPI ARMY NATIONAL GUARD’S
[4] RULE 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6), 12(c) AND ELEVENTH AMENDMENT
MOTION TO DISMISS AND FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
BEFORE THE COURT is Defendant Mississippi Army National Guard’s (“MSARNG”)
Rule 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6), 12(c) and Eleventh Amendment Motion to Dismiss and for Judgment on
the Pleadings (“Eleventh Amendment Motion”) as to all counts and claims brought by Plaintiff
Michael Reed Martz (“Martz”) [4]. Having considered the provisions of Miss. Unif. Civ. L. R.
16(b)(3)(B) & (C),
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
(1)
All proceedings in this action, other than those related to the MSARNG’s [4]
Motion, are STAYED pending a final ruling on that Motion; and
(2)
In the event that the MSARNG’s [4] Motion is denied, counsel shall contact the
undersigned within ten (10) days of the filing of such order and submit a proposed
order lifting the stay.
SO ORDERED, this the 20th day of May, 2013.
/s/ Jane M. Virden __________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?