Drakes v. T.C.C.F. et al

Filing 40

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS : Report and Recommendation APPROVED AND ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court; California Out-of-State Correctional Facility, Mississippi Department of Education and Associate Warden James Nuchring be DISMISSED with prejudice; action proceed against the remaining defendants. Signed by Senior Judge Neal B. Biggers on 9/24/14. (cr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI OXFORD DIVISION DARIO DRAKES, vs. PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:13CV133-NBB-SAA T.C.C.F., et al., DEFENDANTS ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Upon consideration of the files and records in this action, the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated August 26, 2013, was on that date duly served by mail on the pro se plaintiff at his last known address; that he acknowledged receipt of same on August 28, 2013; that more than fourteen days have elapsed since the plaintiff acknowledged receipt of the Report and Recommendation; and that no objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed or served by any party. The Court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation should be approved and adopted as the opinion of the Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED: 1. That the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated August 26, 2013, is hereby APPROVED AND ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. 2. That the California Out-of-State Correctional Facility, the Mississippi Department of Education, and Associate Warden James Nuchring be DISMISSED from this action with prejudice. 3. That the instant action proceed against the remaining defendants. THIS, the 24th day of September, 2013. /s/ Neal Biggers NEAL B. BIGGERS, JR. SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?