Neilson v. Greenlee et al
Filing
15
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. CASE CLOSED. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 7/9/2015. (psk)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
OXFORD DIVISION
PHILIP HALBERT NEILSON
PLAINTIFF
V.
CAUSE NO.: 3:13CV300-SA-SAA
JAMES GREENLEE, ET AL.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Plaintiff originally filed this case on December 13, 2013.
that time to all Defendants [2].
Summonses were issued at
In July of 2014, the Clerk issued a Notice [5] that the
Defendants had not been served as required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The
Magistrate Judge issued an Order to Show Cause [6] and, ultimately, based on Plaintiff’s
response to that Show Cause Order, granted Plaintiff thirty additional days to effect service on all
Defendants [8].
Instead of serving Defendants, however, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint
[9] in September of 2014.
After another period of inactivity, the district judge previously assigned to this case
dismissed the action for failure to prosecute [11].
The case was reopened and reassigned to the
undersigned judge thereafter.
Plaintiff had summonses reissued by the Clerk’s Office on February 9, 2015 [13].
One
hundred twenty days have passed, and Plaintiff has either failed to execute those summonses or
failed to notify the Court that those summonses have been executed.
The Clerk’s Office again
issued a Notice of Incomplete Process warning Plaintiff that the Defendants had not been served
as required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [14].
Accordingly, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), the court, on its own
motion, hereby dismisses this case without prejudice due to incomplete service of process by
Plaintiff.
SO ORDERED, this the 9th day of July, 2015.
/s/ Sharion Aycock_________
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?