United States for the Use and Benefit of Hamilton-Elles, Inc. v. Gulf Group, Inc. et al

Filing 23

ORDER granting 20 Motion to Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 06/13/2014. (lec)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI OXFORD DIVISION UNITED STATES FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF HAMILTON-ELLES, INC. PLAINTIFF VS. CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:14-cv-25-SA-JMV GULF GROUP, INC., et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY This matter comes before the court on the Unopposed Motion of Trey Construction, Inc. to stay the proceedings [20] until Friday July 22, 2014, so the parties may participate in a contractually required mediation on July 9, 2014. Upon due consideration of the motion, the Court finds and orders: 1. That the motion is well-taken; 2. That the granting of a stay in this action until July 22, 2014, will work no undue prejudice to any of the parties; 3. That the granting of a stay in this action will promote judicial economy; 4. That Trey Construction, Inc. shall report to this Court by Friday, July 11, 2014, the outcome of mediation; 5. Should the case be resolved at the July 9, 2014, mediation, a stipulation of dismissal of the action signed by all the parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) will be filed with the court; 6. Should the case not be resolved at the July 9, 2014, mediation, a Case Management Conference will be set a few weeks after July 23, 2014, by further notice of the court. Confidential Memoranda and a Jointly Proposed Case Management Order will be 1 filed with this Court by the date set forth in the Notice of the Case Management Conference; and 7. That on this basis a stay shall be entered in this action until July 22, 2014. SO ORDERED this, the 13th day of June, 2014. /s/Jane M. Virden UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?