Estate of Buck Fondren et al v. Dr. Juan Santos et al

Filing 13

ORDER STAYING CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS. Plaintiff shall notify the undersigned magistrate judge within seven (7) days of a decision on the remand motion and shall submit a proposed order lifting the stay, if appropriate. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 07/16/2014. (lec)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
OXFORD DIVISION
ESTATE OF BUCK FONDREN, ET AL.

PLAINTIFFS

VS.

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:14-cv-131-MPM-JMV

DR. JUAN SANTOS, ET AL.

DEFENDANTS

ORDER STAYING CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS
On July 15, 2014, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Remand, combining various allegations
including lack of subject matter jurisdiction [11]. Pursuant to L. U. CIV. R. 16(b)(1)(B), “[a]
motion to remand . . . will stay the attorney conference and disclosure requirements and all
discovery not relevant to the remand . . . issue and will stay the parties’ obligation to make
disclosures pending the court’s ruling on the motion. . . .”
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the aforementioned proceedings are hereby
STAYED pending a ruling on the motion to remand. Plaintiff shall notify the undersigned
magistrate judge within seven (7) days of a decision on the remand motion and shall submit a
proposed order lifting the stay, if appropriate.
SO ORDERED, this the 16h day of July, 2014.
/s/ Jane M. Virden
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE