Roberson v. McDonald Transit Associates, Inc. et al

Filing 113

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Senior Judge Neal B. Biggers on 11/20/15. (jww)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI OXFORD DIVISION CARROLL D. ROBERSON v. PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:14-CV-00168-NBB-JMV MCDONALD TRANSIT ASSOCIATES, INC., CITY OF OXFORD, MAYOR PAT PATTERSON, OFFICER RON BIGGS AND CALVIN HILL DEFENDANTS ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION On consideration of the file and record of this action, the court finds that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated November 3, 2015, was; recorded on the court’s electronic filing system, accessible to all parties, and that more than fourteen days have passed since the recording of said Report and Recommendation. The defendants object to the magistrate’s Report and Recommendation. Notwithstanding, the court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation should be approved and adopted as the opinion of this court. It is, therefore, ORDERED: 1. that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated November 3, 2015, is hereby approved and adopted as the opinion of this court; 2. that defendants’ objection is OVERRULED; 3. that plaintiff’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against Pat Patterson and Ron Biggs in their individual capacities as mayor and police officer are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice; 4. that plaintiff has fourteen days from this date to file a motion to amend, along with an amended complaint; and 5. that the trial date in this matter will be determined after consideration of plaintiff’s motion to amend and amended complaint or after the expiration of the time the plaintiff has been given to amend his complaint. THIS, the 20th day of November, 2015. /s/ Neal Biggers NEAL B. BIGGERS SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?