Rockwool International A/S v. Rockwool Manufacturing Company
Filing
14
ORDER STAYING CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS. Should the parties desire to undertake jurisdiction related discovery, they should contact the court for scheduling of same. Defendant shall notify the undersigned magistrate judge within seven (7) days of a decision on the motion to dismiss and shall submit a proposed order lifting the stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 02/06/2015. (lec)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
OXFORD DIVISION
ROCKWOOL INTERNATIONAL A/S
VS.
PLAINTIFF
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:14-cv-185-NBB-JMV
ROCKWOOL MANUFACTURING COMPANY
DEFENDANT
ORDER STAYING CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS
Local Uniform Civil Rule 16(b)(3)(B) provides that “[f]iling…a jurisdiction defense
motion stays the attorney conference and disclosure requirements and all discovery not related
to the issue pending the court’s ruling on the motion, including any appeal.” L.U. CIV. R.
16(b)(3)(B) (emphasis added). Because the defendant has raised the issue of jurisdiction by
separate motion [6], staying certain proceedings is appropriate.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the aforementioned proceedings are hereby
STAYED pending a ruling on the motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Should the parties
desire to undertake jurisdiction related discovery, they should contact the court for scheduling of
same. Defendant shall notify the undersigned magistrate judge within seven (7) days of a
decision on the motion to dismiss and shall submit a proposed order lifting the stay.
SO ORDERED this, the 6th day of February, 2015.
/s/ Jane M. Virden
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?