Tacker et al v. Speight
Filing
13
ORDER STAYING CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS. Plaintiff shall notify the undersigned magistrate judge within seven (7) days of a decision on the motion to remand and shall submit a proposed order lifting the stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 01/21/2015. (lec)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
GREENVILLE DIVISION
WILLIAM T. TACKER II, ET AL.
VS.
PLAINTIFF
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:14-cv-269-MPM-JMV
H. MAX SPEIGHT
DEFENDANT
ORDER STAYING CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS
Local Uniform Civil Rule 16(b)(1)(B) provides, “[a] motion to remand . . . will stay the
attorney conference and disclosure requirements and all discovery not relevant to the remand
. . . issue and will stay the parties’ obligation to make disclosures pending the court’s ruling on
the motion . . . .” L.U. CIV. R. 16(b)(1)(B) (emphasis added). Because the plaintiff has filed a
motion to remand [11], staying certain proceedings is appropriate.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the aforementioned proceedings are hereby
STAYED pending a ruling on the motion to remand. Should the parties desire to undertake
remand related discovery, they should contact the court within seven (7) days hereof for
scheduling of same. Plaintiff shall notify the undersigned magistrate judge within seven (7) days
of a decision on the motion to remand and shall submit a proposed order lifting the stay.
SO ORDERED this, the 21st day of January, 2015.
/s/ Jane M. Virden
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?