Tacket v. Guardian Life Insurance Company of America et al

Filing 26

ORDER denying 23 Motion for Remand-Related Discovery. The parties' briefing of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand 15 shall resume pursuant to the court's prior Order 22 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 06/16/2015. (lec)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
OXFORD DIVISION
DIANNE TACKET

PLAINTIFF

VS.

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:15-cv-45-NBB-JMV

GUARDIAN LIVE INSURANCE COMPANY
OF AMERICA, ET AL.

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Remand-Related Discovery [23].
Upon due consideration of the motion, the court finds it is not well-taken. Plaintiff offers, under
the facts of this case, no governing authority for conducting remand-related discovery. In
response, Defendants offer more than thirty pages of legal argument asserting remand-related
discovery is not warranted. Plaintiff did not file a reply. Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion is hereby
DENIED. The parties’ briefing of Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand [15] shall resume pursuant to
the court’s prior Order [22].
SO ORDERED this, the 16th day of June, 2015.
/s/ Jane M. Virden
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE