Cowans v. State of Mississippi

Filing 21

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and Dismissing Case. Signed by District Judge Michael P. Mills on 1/7/2016. (lpm)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
OXFORD DIVISION
WILLIE E. COWANS
vs.

PLAINTIFF
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-CV-101-MPM-JMV

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, DESOTO COUNTY
JUSTICE COURT, ANNIE JAMERSON, JAMES
WOODS, JESSIE J. MAXWELL, JULIUS GUY,
TERRY GUY, and ALFONZO GUY

DEFENDANTS

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On consideration of the record of this action, the court finds that the Report and
Recommendation [18] of the United States Magistrate Judge dated December 7, 2015, was on that
date duly mailed to pro se plaintiff via USPS; that more than fourteen days have elapsed since service
of said Report and Recommendation; and that while objections thereto have been filed by Plaintiff,
such objections are meritless. Plaintiff filed a 15-page [18] Motion to Object to Dismissal and a 35page [20] Motion for Speedy Return, both of which included nothing more than the same
miscellaneous copies of a variety of documents that made up Plaintiff’s previously filed [1] original
complaint, [3] amended complaint, and [16] second amended complaint. The miscellaneous
documents constituting [18] Plaintiff’s Motion to Object to Dismissal and [20] Motion for Speedy
Return remain just a reshuffled copy of the documents previously filed in this action and a duplicate
action filed in this court (see, 3:15-cv-77-MPM-JMV)), lacking, as discussed in the Report and
Recommendation, any assertion of a properly stated claim or basis for this court to exercise
jurisdiction.

The court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation should be
approved and adopted as the opinion of the court. It is, therefore,
ORDERED:
1. That the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated
December 7, 2015, is hereby approved and adopted as the opinion of the court.
2. That the case is hereby DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to
adequately state a claim.
3. That this case is hereby CLOSED.

THIS, the 7th day of January, 2016.

/s/ MICHAEL P. MILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI