Robinson v. Olive Branch Police Department et al
ORDER denying (55) Motion for Reconsideration in case 3:15-cv-00164-MPM-RP; denying (45) Motion for Reconsideration in case 3:15-cv-00196-MPM-RP - Clerk is DIRECTED to place subsequent filings by plaintiff in the correspondence folder unless they are necessary to prosecute a direct appeal. Signed by District Judge Michael P. Mills on 3/30/17. Associated Cases: 3:15-cv-00196-MPM-RP, 3:15-cv-00164-MPM-RP (cr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
LT. CHAD WICKER
DALE K. THOMPSON
JAMES MICHAEL MEZIERE
OLIVE BRANCH POLICE DEPARTMENT
DAKE K. THOMPSON, DESOTO COUNTY CIRCUIT CLERK
LEANNA AND DEJAM TAYLOR
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF=S MOTION
FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT OR ORDER
This matter comes before the court on the plaintiff=s motion for reconsideration of the
court=s final judgment . The court interprets the motion, using the liberal standard for pro se
litigants set forth in Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 (1972), as a motion for relief from a judgment
or order under FED. R. CIV. P. 60. An order granting relief under Rule 60 must be based upon:
(1) clerical mistakes, (2) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect, (3) newly
discovered evidence, (4) fraud or other misconduct of an adverse party, (5) a void judgment, or (6)
any other reason justifying relief from the operation of the order.
The court has also denied the plaintiff’s motions ,  to appeal as a pauper because he
has accumulated three “strikes” under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. This case is closed.
The plaintiff has neither asserted nor proven any of the specific justifications for relief from an
order permitted under Rule 60. In addition, the plaintiff has not presented Aany other reason
justifying relief from the operation@ of the judgment.
For these reasons:
(1) The plaintiff=s request  for reconsideration is DENIED;
(2) In addition, as this case is closed, the plaintiff’s motion  for a hearing is
DISMISSED as moot; and
(3) As this case is closed, should the plaintiff file any more documents in this case other
than those necessary to prosecute a direct appeal, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to place
them in the correspondence folder and send notice to the plaintiff to that effect.
SO ORDERED, this, the 30th day of March, 2017.
/s/ MICHAEL P. MILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?