Robinson v. Hamilton Beach Brands Inc. et al
ORDER denying 5 Motion for Recusal.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 5/4/16. (ncb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-68-MPM-JMV
HAMILTON BEACH BRANDS, INC.,
SEDONA STAFFING, LEANNA, AND
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion  for Recusal. The undersigned has considered
the motion and is of the opinion it should be denied.
By the motion Mr. Robinson requests the undersigned be “taken off” his case, as he
claims it has been “proven” the undersigned is not impartial with respect to “matters that serve
[his] best interest.” Mr. Robinson also claims he has not gotten a response to letters requesting
the same relief in Case No. 3:15cv52 and 3:15cv165. Because Mr. Robinson has failed to cite
any facts in support of his claim that the undersigned cannot be impartial in cases that involve
him and because the undersigned is confident that she can be and has been impartial in this
matter and that justice will be properly administered, the instant motion is DENIED. Further, it
should be noted that the other cases referred to by Plaintiff have been closed by orders of the
district judges in those respective cases.
SO ORDERED this the 4th day of May, 2016.
/s/ Jane M. Virden
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?