Key et al v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. et al

Filing 7

ORDER finding as moot 6 Motion to Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge S. Allan Alexander on 05/02/16. (sd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI OXFORD DIVISION WILLIAM L. KEY and MELANIE KEY VS. PLAINTIFFS CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-81-GHDSAA BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, INC.; BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS TIRE OPERATIONS, LLC; BRIDGESTONE/ FIRESTONE AMERICAS HOLDING, INC.; AND DOES 1-10 DEFENDANTS ORDER Defendant Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC (“Bridgestone”) requests a temporary stay of their time to respond to plaintiffs’ motion to amend complaint, which was filed in state court before the case was removed to this court. Docket 6. Plaintiffs have no objection to Bridgestone’s motion. 16(b)(3)(D) of the LOCAL UNIFORM CIVIL RULES OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI AND THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI states that “in any case that has been removed from state court, the moving party must, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any motions that were filed in state court...” (emphasis added). The Case Management Conference in this case is set for May 16, 2016. Docket 4. Pursuant to 16(b)(3)(D), there is no current briefing schedule regarding plaintiffs’ motion to amend complaint, and until such motion is separately filed on CM/ECF within the time allowed under 16(b)(3)(D), defendants are under no obligation to respond. Accordingly, it is 1 ORDERED that Bridgestone’s motion is DISMISSED AS MOOT. THIS the 2nd day of May, 2016. /s/ S. Allan Alexander UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?