Smith v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage et al
ORDER denying as moot 27 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying as moot 24 Motion for Default Judgment; denying 25 Motion to Vacate ; denying 26 Motion to Vacate. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 3/31/2017. (dbm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-92-SA-SAA
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, and
BRUNINI, GRANTHAM, GROWER & HEWES
The Court dismissed this case without prejudice on January 4, 2017. The Plaintiff has since
filed several motions: Motion to Enter Default Judgment , Motion to Vacate Order Dismissing
Case . Motion to Vacate Order Dismissing Case , and Motion to Amend Evidence of a
Release of Mortgage/Deed of Trust . Contrary to the Plaintiff’s assertions, the Court denied
the Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis for a variety of reasons, and ordered the
Plaintiff to pay the filing fee for his case. See [6, 12]. Because the Plaintiff repeatedly refused to
comply with the Court’s orders, the Court dismissed his case without prejudice. The Court also
barred the Plaintiff from filing future in forma pauperis cases without prior permission from a
Now, the Plaintiff seeks to have the dismissal of his case set aside but fails to raise any
arguments relevant to the reasons his case was dismissed. Finding no grounds to set aside the
dismissal of this case, the Plaintiff’s Motions to Vacate [25, 26] are DENIED.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Enter Default Judgment  is DENIED as MOOT. Plaintiff’s
Motion to Amend Evidence  is DENIED as MOOT.
This the 31st day of March, 2017.
/s/ Sharion Aycock
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?