Gorman v. State of Mississippi et al
Filing
37
ORDER STAYING CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 7/25/17. (ncb)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
OXFORD DIVISION
SUMMER GORMAN
v.
PLAINTIFF
CASE NO: 3:16-cv-204-GHD-JMV
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, ET AL.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER STAYING CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS
Local Uniform Civil Rule 16(b)(3)(B) provides that “[f]iling . . . a motion asserting an
immunity defense . . . stays the attorney conference and disclosure requirements and all
discovery, pending the court’s ruling on the motion, including any appeal.” Because Defendant,
Robert Sharp, has filed a Notice of Appeal [35] of the Order [31] denying in part his qualified
immunity defense motion [17],
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the aforementioned proceedings and the case
management conference are STAYED pending resolution of the appeal.
This 25th day of July, 2017.
/s/ Jane M. Virden
U.S. Magistrate Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
