BankPlus v. New Home Specialist, Inc.

Filing 5

ORDER STAYING CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 12/7/16. (ncb)

Download PDF
IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI OXFORD DIVISION BANKPLUS PLAINTIFF VERSUS CAUSE NO. 3:16CV234-MPM-JMV NEW HOME SPECIALIST, INC. DEFENDANT ORDER STAYING CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS Local Uniform Civil Rule 16(b)(3)(B) provides that “[f]iling a motion . . . asserting [a] jurisdictional defense stays the attorney conference and disclosure requirements and all discovery, pending the court’s ruling on the motion, including any appeal.” Because defendant has raised the issue of lack of subject matter jurisdiction by separate motion [4], IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the aforementioned proceedings and the case management conference are hereby STAYED pending a ruling on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Defendant shall notify the undersigned within seven (7) days of a decision on the motion to dismiss and shall submit a proposed order lifting the stay. This 7th day of December, 2016. /s/ Jane M. Virden U.S. Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?