BankPlus v. New Home Specialist, Inc.
Filing
5
ORDER STAYING CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 12/7/16. (ncb)
IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
OXFORD DIVISION
BANKPLUS
PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
CAUSE NO. 3:16CV234-MPM-JMV
NEW HOME SPECIALIST, INC.
DEFENDANT
ORDER STAYING CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS
Local Uniform Civil Rule 16(b)(3)(B) provides that “[f]iling a motion . . . asserting [a]
jurisdictional defense stays the attorney conference and disclosure requirements and all
discovery, pending the court’s ruling on the motion, including any appeal.” Because defendant
has raised the issue of lack of subject matter jurisdiction by separate motion [4],
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the aforementioned proceedings and the case
management conference are hereby STAYED pending a ruling on defendant’s motion to dismiss
for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Defendant shall notify the undersigned within seven (7)
days of a decision on the motion to dismiss and shall submit a proposed order lifting the stay.
This 7th day of December, 2016.
/s/ Jane M. Virden
U.S. Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?