Curtis v. The United States of America et al

Filing 7

ORDER STAYING CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 5/8/17. (ncb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI OXFORD DIVISION PAUL KEVIN CURTIS PLAINTIFF V. CAUSE NO. 3:16cv00290-NBB-JMV UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOHN DOES 1-15 DEFENDANTS ORDER STAYING CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS Local Uniform Civil Rule 16(b)(3)(B) provides that “[f]iling . . . a motion asserting . . . a [] jurisdictional defense stays the attorney conference and disclosure requirements and all discovery, pending the court’s ruling on the motion, including any appeal.” Because the defendant has raised the issue of subject matter jurisdiction by separate motion [5], IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the aforementioned proceedings are hereby STAYED pending a ruling on the jurisdiction motion. This 8th day of May, 2017. /s/ Jane M. Virden U.S. Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?