Kimble v. Coffeeville Police Dept. et al

Filing 131

ORDER denying 128 Motion for Document ; denying 129 Motion for Discovery; finding as moot 130 Motion for Information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 8/6/18. (jla)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
OXFORD DIVISION
TYROWONE KIMBLE
V.

PLAINTIFF
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:17CV201-RP

GRANT GAMMILL and
MARK MARTIN

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

Pending before the Court are three motions filed by the plaintiff, Tyrowone Kimble: (1)
a motion for all medical documents he submitted as exhibits to his previously-filed motions for
summary judgment at Doc. #59 and Doc. #81; (2) a motion to preclude the defendants from
calling witnesses at trial due to their failure to timely file a witness list; and (3) a “Motion for
Information” in which the plaintiff advises the Court that he may not be receiving all of his mail.
Having fully considered these matters, it is ORDERED:
That the plaintiff’s motion for documents [128] is DENIED, as the plaintiff should have
retained a copy for his records prior to submitting them, and the Court will not order their
reproduction at government expense. Therefore, if plaintiff desires copies of documents he has
filed with the Court, he may request copies from the Clerk’s Office and remit a fee of $.50 per
page for said copies.
That the plaintiff’s motion to preclude the defendants from calling witnesses at trial [129]
is DENIED, as the defendants did, in fact, timely file a witness and exhibit list on March 5,
2018. See Doc. #87.
That the plaintiff’s “Motion of Information” [130] is DISMISSED AS MOOT, as the
motion contains no request for relief.
THIS the 6th day of August, 2018.
/s/ Roy Percy
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE