Hoskins v. Droder et al

Filing 62

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by District Judge Michael P. Mills on 10/12/2018. Associated Cases: 3:17-cv-00224-MPM-JMV, 3:18-cv-00099-MPM-JMV (lpm)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
OXFORD DIVISION
LALANGIE HOSKINS

PLAINTIFF

V.

NO. 3:17cv224-M

EUGENE DRODER, III, ET AL.

DEFENDANTS

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
On consideration of the file and record of this action, the Court finds that the Report and
Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated May 14, 2018, was on that date duly
served upon the parties and that more than fourteen days have elapsed since service of the Report
and Recommendation. Although Plaintiff filed an objection [35], the substance of the objection
opposed Defendants’ Motion for an Extension of Time [14]—previously granted by the Magistrate
Judge in her April 24, 2018 Order [29]—and not the R&R directly. Therefore, no valid objection
to the R&R was filed or served by any party. The Court finds that the Magistrate Judge’s Report
and Recommendation should be approved and adopted as the opinion of the Court.
It is, therefore ORDERED:
1. That the Report and Recommendation [32] of the United States Magistrate Judge dated
May 14, 2018, is hereby approved and adopted as the opinion of the Court.
2. That the Plaintiff’s’ Motion for Default Judgment [18] is hereby DENIED.
THIS, the 12th day of October, 2018.

/s/ MICHAEL P. MILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI