Roberts v. Berryhill
Filing
25
ORDER granting 23 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 12/27/18. (ncb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
OXFORD DIVISION
LINDA LOUISE ROBERTS
PLAINTIFF
V.
NO. 3:17CV00235-JMV
NANCY BERRYHILL,
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
DEFENDANT
ORDER ON PETITION FOR ATTORNEY FEES
Before the court are Plaintiff’s motion [23] for attorney fees pursuant to the Equal Access to
Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and Defendant’s response [24].
For the reasons set out
below, the motion will be granted.
In these proceedings Plaintiff sought judicial review of the Social Security Commissioner’s final
decision denying a claim for benefits.
By Final Judgment [22] dated October 17, 2018, this court
reversed and remanded this case to the Commissioner for further proceedings.
Plaintiff now seeks
attorney fees in the amount of $6,489.24 for attorney work before this court on the ground that Plaintiff
was the prevailing party.
Defendant indicates she has no objection to the requested award.
The court, having thoroughly considered the motion, the response, and the applicable law, finds
the requested award is reasonable, and no special circumstance would make the award unjust.
Additionally, the court finds the award should be made payable to Plaintiff.
See generally Astrue v.
Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010).
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED:
That the Acting Commissioner shall promptly pay to Plaintiff a total of $6,489.24 in attorney fees
for the benefit of counsel for Plaintiff.
This 27th day of December, 2018.
/s/ Jane M. Virden
U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?