Wrenn v. Middlebrooks
Certificate of Appealability Denied. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 1/10/22. (jla)
Case: 3:20-cv-00094-SA-DAS Doc #: 14 Filed: 01/10/22 1 of 1 PageID #: 1857
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
JOHN E. WRENN
CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
A notice of appeal having been filed in the above captioned case from either the final
order in a habeas corpus proceeding in which the detention complained of arises out of process
issued by a state court under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 or the final order in a proceeding under 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255, the court, considering the record in the case and the requirements of Fed. R. App. P.
22(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), hereby finds that:
the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.
a certificate of appealability should not issue.
REASONS FOR DENIAL: For the reasons stated in its opinion, the court finds that the
Petitioner has failed to “demonstrate that the issues are debatable among jurists of reason; that a
court could resolve issues in a different manner; or that the questions are adequate to deserve
encouragement to proceed further.” Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 893 n.4, 103 S.Ct. 3383,
3394 n.4, 77 L.Ed.2d 1090 (1993) (superseded by statute) (citations and quotations omitted); 28
U.S.C. § 2253(c) (1) and (2). Specifically, the court finds, for the reasons set forth in its
memorandum opinion and final judgment, that the instant Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or
Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 should be denied.
SO ORDERED, this, the 10th day of January, 2022.
/s/ Sharion Aycock
U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?