Wingo v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al

Filing 13

ORDER STAYING CASE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 6/24/21. (jla)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI OXFORD DIVISION MARTREK D. WINGO v. AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON.COM SALES, INC., AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC, AND JEFF BEZOS PLAINTIFF NO.: 3:21-CV-83-MPM-JMV DEFENDANTS ORDER STAYING CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS Local Uniform Civil Rule 16(b)(3)(B) provides that “a motion asserting. . . a jurisdictional defense. . . stays the attorney conference and disclosure requirements and all discovery, pending the court’s ruling on the motion, including any appeal. Whether to permit discovery on issues related to a motion… [is a decision] committed to the discretion of the court, upon a motion by any party seeking relief.” L.U. CIV. R. 16(b)(3)(B). Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss based on jurisdictional defense [11]. Accordingly, staying discovery in this case is appropriate at this time. IT IS, THERFORE, ORDERED that the aforementioned proceedings are hereby STAYED pending a ruling on the motion to dismiss. Defendants shall notify the undersigned magistrate judge within seven (7) days of a decision on the immunity motion and shall submit a proposed order lifting the stay. SO ORDERED this 24th day of June, 2021 /s/ Jane M. Virden UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?