Wingo v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
Filing
13
ORDER STAYING CASE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 6/24/21. (jla)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
OXFORD DIVISION
MARTREK D. WINGO
v.
AMAZON.COM, INC.,
AMAZON.COM SALES, INC.,
AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC, AND
JEFF BEZOS
PLAINTIFF
NO.: 3:21-CV-83-MPM-JMV
DEFENDANTS
ORDER STAYING CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS
Local Uniform Civil Rule 16(b)(3)(B) provides that “a motion asserting. . . a jurisdictional
defense. . . stays the attorney conference and disclosure requirements and all discovery, pending
the court’s ruling on the motion, including any appeal. Whether to permit discovery on issues
related to a motion… [is a decision] committed to the discretion of the court, upon a motion by
any party seeking relief.” L.U. CIV. R. 16(b)(3)(B).
Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss based on jurisdictional defense [11].
Accordingly, staying discovery in this case is appropriate at this time.
IT IS, THERFORE, ORDERED that the aforementioned proceedings are hereby
STAYED pending a ruling on the motion to dismiss. Defendants shall notify the undersigned
magistrate judge within seven (7) days of a decision on the immunity motion and shall submit a
proposed order lifting the stay.
SO ORDERED this 24th day of June, 2021
/s/ Jane M. Virden
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?