USA v. G'wood Public Sch
Filing
35
ORDER granting 32 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 6/30/2015. (psk)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTIITRN DISTRICT OF MISSISSPPI
GREENVILLE DIVISION
UMTED STATES OF AMERICA
PLAINTIFF
V.
GREENWOOD MUMCIPAL SEPARATE
SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al
DEFENDANT
)
)
)
)
)
NO: 4:66-cv-00040-LTS
)
)
)
)
)
)
ORDER GRANTING EMERGENCY SUPPLEMENTAL RELIEF
ON THIS DAY, this cause came on for consideration in the United States District
Court for the Northem District of Mississippi, on the Greenwood Municipal Separate School
District's Second Amended Motion for Emergency Supplemental Relief and Expedited
Ruling, and this Court after being fully advised in the premises, finds and orders as follows:
l.
The Greenwood Municipal Separate School District (hereinafter "Greenwood
Public School District" or "District") presently consists of one high school (Greenwood
High), one middle school (Greenwood Middle), an altemative school (Greenwood
Alternative School), a career and technical center (Greenwood Vocational Center), and
four elementary schools (Bankston, Davis, Threadgill and W. C. Williams Elementary
Schools.) Each elementary school serves kindergarten through sixth grade, excluding
Threadgill, which serves pre-K through sixth grade.
2.
On or about June 10, 2014, the Board of Trustees of the Greenwood Public
School District authorized the superintendent to explore cost saving propomls that would
firrther promote the fiscal responsibility of the District.
3.
This process led the District to conclude that it should close W. C. Williams,
reassigr those affected students to Bankston and Threadgill elementary schools, and revise
the elementary school zones to reflect those changes.
4.
The District developed two plans and proposed them to the United States
Departrnent of Justice, which did not object to either plan. The Dis&ict also subsequently
conducted meetings with both W. C. Williams parents and staff to obtain their feedback.
5.
The District thereafter approved the closure of W.C. Williams at the end of the
2014-2015 school year and the adoption of Plan B.
6.
Under Plan B, all students would attend
tle
elementary school within the
school zone where they reside, as set forth in the map (Exhibit 1) attached hereto, except the
District could allow: (1) fourth (4th) and frfth (5th) emde Threadgill students for the 20142015 school year the option of continuing their attendance at Threadgill, if they so selected,
until their completion of elementary school through the 2016-2017 school year (i.e. ,.limited
gmndfathering provision"), (2) exceptions for those students who receive special education
services, whether at a centralized or non-centralized location within the district, whereas said
services are available outside
of their residential school zone, and (3) majority/minority
transfers should the district resident students in the future meet the criteria as set forth in
previous orders entered in this case.
7.
The District's projected student enrollment of the elementary schools,
affected by Plan B, is set forth in Exhibit 2 as atached hereto.
as
IT IS THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED (l)
the
Greenwood Public School District's motion to proceed with the closure of W. C. Williams
Elementary School and modify district school zone lines of the Greenwood Public School
District consistent with Plan B as presented is approved effective immediately Q) that the
District may allow the following exceptions to Plan B, to wit: (a) fourth
(
grade Threadgill students for the 2014-2015 school year the option
of continuing their
attendance
at Threadgill,
if
th) and fifth (5th)
they so selecte{ until their completion of elementary school
through the 2O16-2017 school year (i.e. "limited grandfathering provision"), (b) exceptions
for those students who receive special education services, whether at a cenhalized or noncentralized location within the district, whereas said services are available outside of their
residential school zone, and (c) majority/minority transfers should the district resident
students in the future meet the criteria in those previous orders entered in this case; (3) said
actions are
not
inconsistent
with the United States Constitution, applicable
federal
desegregation laws and orders in this case, and (4) that all other previous orders of this Court,
except as modified herein, shall-remain in
DArEDthisthe
e^$
30\,
A
full force
and effect.
,2015.
Greenwood Public School District
Proposed Consolidation School Zone
P
l*rht
EDff
rJ;l
ffi,H,ffi
,qnnm.l"|-t!f_
I
t
l;l
.a
rrr
trxh;b;* L
dt'
atb
Tatile 1
Greenwood Public sciools and Projected Membenhip as Proposed by Special
StudY GrouP with Federal lnPur.
plan B (SIUDENTS) with (Grandfather Provision for Threadgill Zone north of river merging with Bankston)
**rools, capacitres, April 26,7ll5,Pupil Membership by
SCHOOLS
PRESENT
CAPACITY
Race
-
%%%
uEMiirnsHtp
9L'"%
IVHIIE
PROPOSED MEMBENSHIP
BLACI( WHITE
tsLACK
OTHER
OTHER
I
500
K-5
to7
160
2L
288
55%
37%
8Y"
K-5
L42
240
31
4t3
s8%
34%
8%
BANKSTON
700
K-6
2
s89
0
591
99.6%
0.3%
o%
K-6
2
589
0
591
99.6
o.3%
a%
DAVIS
900
K-6
2
616
L
619
99.5%
o.3%
o.2%
K-5
3
79L
I
795
99.5%
o.4%
o.1%
THREADGILL
soo
K-6
36
25s
10
301
85%
L2%
3%
TO
BE
l.btl0
\-l,r
f47 1,6J0 j2
8"
):
K
lj
2%
w.c.
WILLIAMS
OISCONTINUED
s:i6&F.ffiffiH@*w
I,ll.rl
1799 9C''"
6
1jr
I'6?() 32
<
Exh;L;* Z
L'799 90''l
'
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?