Electronic Controls, Inc. v. Amtel Security Systems, Inc. et al

Filing 130

AMENDED ORDER correcting #129 Order. Signed by David A. Sanders on 4/6/11. (ncb)

Download PDF
Electronic Controls, Inc. v. Amtel Security Systems, Inc. et al Doc. 130 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI GREENVILLE DIVISION ELECTRONIC CONTROLS, INC. VS. AMTEL SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL., AMENDED ORDER Before the court is a motion for leave to proceed pro se or for additional time to secure counsel (# 128) filed by James Smith on behalf of Plaintiff Electronic Controls, Inc. Smith is the President of Electronic Controls, Inc., and seeks to proceed in this action on behalf of the corporation without counsel. Although 28 U.S.C. 1654 authorizes individuals to appear in federal courts pro se, the statute is silent regarding corporations. The lack of authorization in 1654 has been interpreted as barring corporations from appearing in federal court without an attorney. Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory Council, 506 U.S. 194, 202 (1993). Accordingly, on or before April 18, 2011, licensed counsel must enter an appearance in this case on behalf of Electronic Controls, Inc. or this case will be dismissed without prejudice. The pretrial conference currently scheduled for April 18, 2011 is hereby cancelled and will be reset by separate notice. SO ORDERED this 6th day of April, 2011. /s/David A. Sanders U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE PLAINTIFF NO. 4:07cv46-WAP-EMB DEFENDANTS Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?