Sivori v. Sparkman et al

Filing 140

ORDER DISMISSING as MOOT (137) Motion to Dismiss in case 4:10-cv-00008-MPM-JMV; DISMISSING as MOOT (141) Motion to Dismiss in case 4:16-cv-00074-MPM-JMV. Signed by District Judge Michael P. Mills on 8/18/21. Associated Cases: 4:16-cv-00074-MPM-JMV, 4:10-cv-00008-MPM-JMV (cb)

Download PDF
Case: 4:10-cv-00008-MPM-JMV Doc #: 140 Filed: 08/18/21 1 of 1 PageID #: 801 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI GREENVILLE DIVISION FRANK SIVORI PLAINTIFF v. No. 4:10CV8-MPM-JMV DEPUTY COMMISSIONER EMMITT SPARKMAN, ET AL. DEFENDANTS Consolidated With FRANK SIVORI PLAINTIFF v. No. 4:16CV74-MPM-JMV DEPUTY COMMISSIONER EMMITT SPARKMAN, ET AL. DEFENDANTS ORDER DISMISSING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS [137 – LEAD CASE], [141 – COMPANION CASE] TO DISMISS EARLIER MOTIONS [114 – LEAD CASE], [118 – COMPANION CASE] FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT This matter comes before the court on the plaintiff’s motions [137 – lead case], [141 – companion case] to dismiss without prejudice his earlier motions [114 – lead case], [118 – companion case] for relief from judgment or order. The plaintiff has alleged that the defendants have violated his right to freely exercise his religion by failing to provide him with an appropriate religious diet. Mr. Sivori notes in the instant motion that the prison’s food service contract with the current provider is set to expire, and he believes it is pragmatic to dismiss the current motions without prejudice. As the court has already denied the earlier requests for relief from judgment, the present motions [137 – lead case], [141 – companion case] seeking to dismiss the earlier requests are DISMISSED as moot. SO ORDERED, this, the 18th day of August, 2021. /s/ Michael P. Mills UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?