Sivori v. Sparkman et al

Filing 18

ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS and ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 15 . Defendants Emmitt Sparkman, Lawrence Kelly and Janice Guest are DISMISSED; matter shall proceed as to the remaining defendants and claims. Signed by W. Allen Pepper on 6/2/10. (cr, USDC)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI GREENVILLE DIVISION FRANK SIVORI V. EMMITT SPARKMAN, et al. ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS and ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The plaintiff, an inmate proceeding pro se, filed this complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The plaintiff's complaint included claims for violation of due process, denial of access-to-the-courts, denial of adequate medical care and denial of his right to free exercise of religion. Following a hearing held in accordance with Spears v. McCotter, 766 F.2d 179 (5th Cir. 1985), the Magistrate Judge submitted a report recommending the dismissal of some of the claims and some of the defendants. The plaintiff has filed objections to the report and recommendation. The court finds that for reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation dated May 13, 2010, the plaintiff's objections are not well taken. THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that (1) the plaintiff's objections to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are OVERRULED; (2) the Report and Recommendation (docket entry 15) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the opinion of this court; (3) the denial of access-to-the-courts claim is DISMISSED; (4) defendants Emmitt Sparkman and Lawrence Kelly are DISMISSED; (5) defendant Janice Guest is DISMISSED; and (4) this matter shall proceed as to the remaining defendants and claims. SO ORDERED, this the 2nd day of June, 2010. /s/ W. Allen Pepper, Jr. W. ALLEN PEPPER, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE PLAINTIFF NO. 4:10CV008-P-A DEFENDANTS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?