Dedeaux v. Gregory et al
Filing
29
ORDER denying 27 Motion to Compel; denying 28 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by David A. Sanders on 10/20/10. (ncb, USDC)
<![CDATA[
Dedeaux v. Gregory et al
Doc. 29
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI GREENVILLE DIVISION ABEL J. DEDEAUX V. DENNIS GREGORY, ET AL. ORDER Before the court are two motions filed by the pro se plaintiff. By his first motion (# 27), the plaintiff seeks to compel production of his medical records from the defendants named in the complaint. Because the defendants have not yet been called upon to answer the allegations of the complaint, the court is without authority to compel production of these records. And, to the extent the plaintiff's motion may be construed as a motion to subpoena these records, it is premature. This case is currently pending before the district judge on a report and recommendation (# 17) for summary dismissal for failure to state a claim, and no discovery has been allowed. Accordingly, the plaintiff's first motion is denied. The plaintiff's second motion (#28) is for appointment of counsel. There is no automatic right to counsel in a §1983 case. Wright v. Dallas County Sheriff Department, 660 F.2d 623, 625-26 (5th Cir. 1981); Cupit v. Jones, 835 F.2d 82, 86 (5th Cir. 1987). Unless there are "exceptional circumstances," a district court is not required to appoint counsel to represent indigent plaintiffs in a civil action. Branch v. Cole, 686 F.2d 264, 266 (5th Cir. 1982); see also, Feist v. Jefferson County Commissioners Court, 778 F.2d 250, 253 (5th Cir. 1985). The court finds the plaintiff has failed to show that any exceptional circumstance warrants appointment of counsel at this stage of the proceedings. Accordingly, this motion is denied without prejudice to PLAINTIFF NO: 4:10CV34-GHD-DAS DEFENDANTS
Dockets.Justia.com
the plaintiff's right to reassert the motion should the court fail to adopt the pending report and recommendation. SO ORDERED this 20th day of October, 2010.
/s/ David A. Sanders U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
