Powers v. Epps et al

Filing 22

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; Timothy Morris, Gloria Perry, John Rogers, Christopher Epps and Lawrence Kelly terminated.; adopting Report and Recommendations re 19 Report and Recommendations. Signed by W. Allen Pepper on 12/12/2011. (pls)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI GREENVILLE DIVISION STEPHEN ELLIOTT POWERS v. PLAINTIFF No. 4:10CV57-P-A CHRISTOPHER EPPS, ET AL., ET AL. DEFENDANTS ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Upon consideration of the file and records in this action, the court finds that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated September 12, 2011, was on that date duly served by mail upon the pro se plaintiff at his last known address; that more than fourteen days have elapsed since service of the Report and Recommendation; and that no objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed or served by any party. The court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation should be approved and adopted as the opinion of the court. It is, therefore ORDERED: 1. That the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated September 12, 2011, is hereby APPROVED AND ADOPTED as the opinion of the court. 2. That defendants claims against Christopher Epps, Lawrence Kelly, and Dr. Gloria Perry, Deputy Warden John Rogers, and Warden Timothy Morris are DISMISSED for failure to state a constitutional claim. 3. That the plaintiff’s claims for denial of adequate medical care should, however, proceed against defendants Dr. John Evans, Dr. Thomas Lehman, Dr. Dominic Trinch, Dr. James Burke, Dr. John Payne, Dr. Kim Myung, Deputy Warden George Davenport, Dr. Heinz Schafer, and the University Medical Center. THIS, the 12th day of December, 2011. /s/ W. Allen Pepper, Jr. W. ALLEN PEPPER, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?