Centerpoint Energy Resources Corp. v. Mississippi Rice and Grain II, LLC

Filing 46

ORDER denying 40 Motion to Strike ; denying 32 Motion to Strike. Signed by Jane M Virden on 7/12/2012. (sef)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI GREENVILLE DIVISION CENTERPOINT ENERGY RESOURCES CORP. D/B/A CENTERPOINT ENERGY MISSISSIPPI GAS V. PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:11-cv-109-SA-JMV MISSISSIPPI RICE AND GRAIN II, LLC DEFENDANT ORDER This cause is before the court on the defendant's motions to strike plaintiff's designation of experts and supplemental designation (#32 and #40). The court, having reviewed the record, the motion, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law, and having heard oral argument, finds as follows: For the reasons announced in detail by the court on the record at the conclusion of the motion hearing on July 12, 2012, the court finds that the first motion is denied for failure to contain a good faith certificate and the second motion is denied for that reason and the further reason that it constitutes a sufficient disclosure under the FRCP 26(a)(2)(C). Accordingly, the motions are not well taken, and shall be DENIED. Parties are to bear their own costs. Additionally, in light of today's ruling, the court finds it necessary to move current case management order deadlines as follows: • • • Defendant's designation of experts: September 13, 2012 Discovery deadline: October 30, 2012 Dispositive motions deadline: November 13, 2012 SO ORDERED this, the 12th day of July, 2012. /s/Jane M. Virden U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?