McFarland v. Brooks et al

Filing 18

JUDGMENT ADOPTING 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, Earnest Lee, Faye Noel, Tom Tabler, Jeffrey Brown and Morgan Farnell terminated.. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 2/9/15. (tab)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI GREENVILLE DIVISION TAKEI MCFARLAND PLAINTIFF V. NO. 4:14-CV-00090-DMB-SAA STANLEY BROOKS, et al. DEFENDANTS JUDGMENT Upon consideration of the file and records in this action, the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated December 17, 2014, was on that date duly served by mail on the pro se plaintiff at his last known address; that the plaintiff acknowledged receipt of the Report and Recommendation on January 2, 2015; that more than fourteen days have elapsed since service of the Report and Recommendation; and that no objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed or served by any party. The Court is of the opinion that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation should be approved and adopted as the opinion of the Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED: 1. That the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated December 17, 2014, is hereby APPROVED AND ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. 2. That defendants Earnest Lee, Tom Tabler, Faye Noel, Morgan Farnell, Jeffrey Brown, Archie Longley, Christopher Epps, and Donnis Chatman are DISMISSED from this cause with prejudice. 3. That the plaintiff’s conspiracy and medical care claims are DISMISSED. 4. That the plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claim concerning the working conditions to which he was exposed will PROCEED as to defendants Stanley Brooks, Ed Cole, Henry Gipson, and Richard Gipson. SO ORDERED, this 9th day of February, 2015. /s/ Debra M. Brown UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?