Harris v. National Hotel and Casino, LLC

Filing 12

ORDER informing Plaintiff for a second time that entry of default must be requested. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 01/13/2015. (lec)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI GREENVILLE DIVISION KENNETH HARRIS PLAINTIFF VS. CIVIL ACTION NO.: 4:14-cv-128-DMB-JMV NATIONAL HOTEL AND CASINO, LLC DEFENDANT ORDER This matter is before the court, sua sponte, on the clerk’s notice of default [11]. Plaintiff filed this action on September 2, 2014, alleging wrongful employment termination. The court granted his Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [2] by order dated October 7, 2014 [6]. The clerk of court entered a notice of default on December 17, 2014, directing Plaintiff to request entry of default against Defendant. The notice further warned Plaintiff his failure to do so may result in his case against Defendant being dismissed. No activity has occurred in this case since that time. The court finds it necessary to inform Plaintiff for a second time that entry of default must be requested by him in the form of a pleading filed with the court. The pleading may be as simple as a document sent to the court stating, “Please enter default.” Plaintiff is also directed to consult the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure under the “Representing Yourself” tab on the court’s website located at http://www.msnd.uscourts.gov/. In light of the Plaintiff’s pro se status, the court will allow him thirty (30) additional days from the date of this order to request entry of default against Defendant National Hotel and Casino. If Plaintiff fails to do so, the undersigned will recommend to the District Judge that this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. SO ORDERED this, the 13th day of January, 2015. /s/Jane M. Virden UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?