Harris v. National Hotel and Casino, LLC
Filing
36
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 7/13/15. (jtm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
GREENVILLE DIVISION
KENNETH HARRIS
V.
PLAINTIFF
NO. 4:14-cv-00128-DMB-JMV
NATIONAL HOTEL AND CASINO, LLC
DEFENDANT
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
On May 27, 2015, U.S. Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden issued a Report and
Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to
State a Claim [27] be granted. Doc. #35. The R&R warned that “any … objections [to the
R&R] are required to be in writing and must be filed within fourteen days of this date. Failure to
timely file written objections … will bar an aggrieved party, except upon grounds of plain error,
from attacking on appeal unobjected-to proposed factual findings and legal conclusions accepted
by the district court.” Id. at 1-2. A copy of the R&R was mailed to the pro se plaintiff via
United States Postal Service on May 27, 2015.
More than fourteen days have elapsed since service of the R&R and no objection thereto
has been filed or served by any party. Accordingly, this Court’s review of the R&R is limited to
plain error. See Molina-Uribe v. U.S., No. B:97-97, 2009 WL 3535498, at *15 (S.D. Tex. Sep.
10, 2009) (“In the absence of plain error, a party’s failure to object timely to a Magistrate
Judge’s Report and Recommendation waives any right to further judicial review of that
decision.”) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428–29 (5th Cir.
1997)).
The Court has reviewed the R&R and has found no plain error. Accordingly, the R&R is
APPROVED and ADOPTED as the opinion of the court. Thus, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss
for Failure to State a Claim [27] is GRANTED and this case is hereby DISMISSED.
SO ORDERED, this 13th day of July, 2015.
/s/ Debra M. Brown
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?