Leonard Davis III v. M. Beckem et al
Filing
22
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. 19 ; Case DISMISSED without prejudice; motion to dismiss 21 DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 12/28/17. (cr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
GREENVILLE DIVISION
LEONARD DAVIS, III
PLAINTIFF
V.
NO. 4:14-CV-150-DMB-DAS
M. BECKEM
DEFENDANT
ORDER
On March 16, 2017, United States Magistrate Judge David A. Sanders issued a Report and
Recommendation recommending “that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and for
failure to obey an order of the court.” Doc. #19 at 1. Davis acknowledged receipt of the Report
and Recommendation on March 20, 2017, Doc. #20, but did not file objections. However, on or
about April 3, 2017, Davis filed a motion to dismiss. Doc. #21. In the motion, Davis states that
he “[r]espectfully … agree[s] with the recommendation from the court … and request[s] [that this
case] be dismissed.” Id. at 2.
“When there has been no objection to a report and recommendation, review is limited to
plain error.” Morales v. Mosley, No. 3:13-cv-848, 2014 WL 5410326, at *2 (S.D. Miss. Oct. 22,
2014) (citing Shelby v. City of El Paso, 577 F. App’x 327, 331 (5th Cir. 2014)). Having reviewed
the Report and Recommendation and found no plain error:
1.
The Report and Recommendation [19] is ADOPTED as the order of the Court.
2.
This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute and comply
with the Court’s order; and
3.
Davis’ motion to dismiss [21] is DENIED as moot.
SO ORDERED, this 28th day of December, 2017.
/s/Debra M. Brown
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?