Evans v. Santos et al

Filing 85

ORDER denying 19 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 1/15/16. (tab)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI GREENVILLE DIVISION TIMOTHY N. EVANS PLAINTIFF V. NO. 4:15-CV-00072-DMB-JMV DR. JUAN SANTOS, ET AL. DEFENDANTS ORDER DENYING INJUNCTIVE RELIEF Plaintiff Timothy N. Evans has filed a motion for injunctive relief in which he requests the Court order that he continue to receive all of his medication at a KOP, or “keep on person,” status. Doc. #19. A party seeking injunctive relief must prove four elements: (1) a substantial likelihood of success on the merits; (2) a substantial threat of irreparable injury if the injunction is not issued; (3) that the threatened injury to the movant outweighs any harm that the injunction will cause the nonmovant; and (4) that the injunction is in the public interest. Women=s Med. Ctr. of Nw. Houston v. Bell, 248 F.3d 411, 419 n.15 (5th Cir. 2001); DSC Communications Corp. v. DGI Technologies, Inc., 81 F.3d 597, 600 (5th Cir. 1996). An injunction is an extraordinary remedy that is Anot to be granted routinely, but only when the movant, by a clear showing, carries [the] burden of persuasion.@ Black Fire Fighters Ass’n v. City of Dallas, 905 F.2d 63, 65 (5th Cir. 1990) (citation omitted); see also Lewis v. S.S. Baune, 534 F.2d 1115, 1121 (5th Cir. 1976) (Ainjunction is an extraordinary remedy and should not issue except upon a clear showing of possible irreparable injury@). The instant motion is primarily a recitation of the grievances contained in Evans’ complaint and its various amendments. By his own admission, Evans is currently receiving his medications and, therefore, the denial of injunctive relief will not cause him irreparable injury. It appears to the Court that the ordinary judicial process is sufficient to remedy any injuries Evans has suffered or might suffer as a result of the defendants= alleged actions. Accordingly, Evans’ motion for injunctive relief [19] is DENIED. SO ORDERED, this 15th day of January, 2016. /s/ Debra M. Brown UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?