Super Truck Stop 35-55, LLC et al v. Singh et al

Filing 17

ORDER granting in part and denying in part Motion to Stay 16 . Pursuant to Local Uniform Civil Rule 16(b)(1)(B), certain proceedings are stayed pending the court's ruling on the Motion to Remand 13 . To the extent any Defendant seeks additional time to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint 15 , a proper motion should be filed with the court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 10/14/2015. (bbf)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
GREENVILLE DIVISION
SUPER TRUCK STOP 35-55, LLC, JAGIR
SINGH, MANJIT SINGH JOHAL, and SANJAY
KUMAR
VS.

PLAINTIFFS
CASE NO. 4:15-CV-125-DMB-JMV

NISSI INSURANCE SOLUTIONS, LLC, d/b/a,
HORIZON INSURANCE GROUP, MICHAEL
WELLS, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT
LLOYD’S LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY
NUMBER LBW522102, NORTHLAND
INSURANCE COMPANY, d/b/a NORTHFIELD
INSURANCE COMPANY AND JOHN DOES 1-10

DEFENDANTS

ORDER STAYING CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS
Local Uniform Civil Rule 16(b)(1)(B) provides that “A motion to remand . . . will stay
the attorney conference and disclosure requirements and all discovery not relevant to the
remand . . . and will stay the parties’ obligation to make disclosures pending the court’s ruling
on the motions.” (emphasis added). Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Remand [13] on October 9,
2015.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the aforementioned proceedings are hereby
STAYED pending a ruling on the Motion to Remand [13]. In addition, the initial Case
Management Conference scheduled for November 2, 2015, is hereby stayed pending a ruling on
the Motion to Remand [13]. Should the parties desire to undertake jurisdiction related discovery,
they should contact the court for scheduling of same. The parties shall notify the undersigned
magistrate judge within seven (7) days of a decision on the motion to remand and shall submit a
proposed order lifting the stay in the event the remand motion is denied.

To the extent any Defendant seeks additional time to file a responsive pleading to
Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint [15], a proper motion should be filed with the court.
SO ORDERED this, the 14th day of October, 2015.
/s/ Jane M. Virden
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE