Cooper et al v. Meritor, Inc. et al
Filing
395
ORDER re (288 in 4:16-cv-00053-DMB-JMV, 290 in 4:16-cv-00056-DMB-JMV, 292 in 4:16-cv-00055-DMB-JMV, 290 in 4:16-cv-00054-DMB-JMV, 350 in 4:16-cv-00052-DMB-JMV) Notice of Hearing re Privilege Log. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 11/7/17. Associated Cases: 4:16-cv-00052-DMB-JMV, 4:16-cv-00053-DMB-JMV, 4:16-cv-00054-DMB-JMV, 4:16-cv-00055-DMB-JMV, 4:16-cv-00056-DMB-JMV (bfg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
GREENVILLE DIVISION
PLAINTIFFS
BRENDA J. COOPER, ET AL.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:16-CV-52-DMB-JMV
VS.
MERITOR, INC., ET AL.
DEFENDANTS
CONSOLIDATED WITH
PLAINTIFFS
JOE E. SLEDGE, ET AL.
VS.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:16-CV-53-DMB-JMV
MERITOR, INC., ET AL.
DEFENDANTS
AND
KATHERINE LONGSTREET COOKE, ET AL.
PLAINTIFFS
VS.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:16-CV-54-DMB-JMV
MERITOR, INC., ET AL.
DEFENDANTS
AND
PLAINTIFFS
SRA INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL.
VS.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:16-CV-55-DMB-JMV
MERITOR, INC., ET AL.
DEFENDANTS
AND
FELICIA WILLIS, ET AL.
PLAINTIFFS
VS.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:16-CV-56-DMB-JMV
MERITOR, INC., ET AL.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
This matter was originally set as a hearing on claimed privileges. However, at the outset of
the hearing, counsel for all parties jointly requested that the hearing be converted to a conference
as more particularly described in Section 6(F)(4) of the [83] Case Management Order.
During the course of the conference, the court sua sponte, ordered that the defendant revise
its privilege log, forthwith, in accordance with the court's directions concerning the need for greater
specificity and accurate descriptions of all documents.
The court further ruled that the privilege log may not be further amended to add privileges
except as may be necessary regarding documents not previously described in the privilege log but
which were submitted to the court in camera.
SO ORDERED this, the 7th day of November, 2017.
/s/ Jane M. Virden
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?