Burchfield v. Foremost Insurance Group et al

Filing 49

ORDER CLOSING CASE. CASE CLOSED. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 9/14/17. (tab)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI GREENVILLE DIVISION HARVEY BURCHFIELD and CAMERON BURCHFIELD PLAINTIFFS V. NO. 4:16-CV-172-DMB-JMV FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN DEFENDANT ORDER CLOSING CASE On September 6, 2017, the plaintiffs first filed a “Joint Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice” and then a “Stipulation of Dismissal Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii),” both of which are signed on behalf of all parties.1 Doc. #47; Doc. #48. The stipulation of dismissal states that “Plaintiffs and Defendant hereby stipulate to the dismissal of this action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party will bear their own attorneys’ fees, expenses and costs.” Doc. #48. In light of the stipulation, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case on the Court’s docket. Accordingly, the joint motion [47] is DENIED as moot.2 SO ORDERED, this 14th day of September, 2017. /s/Debra M. Brown UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 The original complaint named one plaintiff and five defendants. The Court dismissed four of the named defendants in its March 28, 2017, order. The amended complaint filed on May 25, 2017, with leave of the Court, named an additional plaintiff and the sole remaining defendant. 2 For the same reason, the only other pending motion [41] is also denied as moot.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?