Burchfield v. Foremost Insurance Group et al
Filing
49
ORDER CLOSING CASE. CASE CLOSED. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 9/14/17. (tab)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
GREENVILLE DIVISION
HARVEY BURCHFIELD and
CAMERON BURCHFIELD
PLAINTIFFS
V.
NO. 4:16-CV-172-DMB-JMV
FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY
GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN
DEFENDANT
ORDER CLOSING CASE
On September 6, 2017, the plaintiffs first filed a “Joint Motion for Dismissal with
Prejudice” and then a “Stipulation of Dismissal Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii),” both of
which are signed on behalf of all parties.1 Doc. #47; Doc. #48. The stipulation of dismissal
states that “Plaintiffs and Defendant hereby stipulate to the dismissal of this action with prejudice
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party will bear their own
attorneys’ fees, expenses and costs.” Doc. #48.
In light of the stipulation, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case on the
Court’s docket. Accordingly, the joint motion [47] is DENIED as moot.2
SO ORDERED, this 14th day of September, 2017.
/s/Debra M. Brown
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
The original complaint named one plaintiff and five defendants. The Court dismissed four of the named
defendants in its March 28, 2017, order. The amended complaint filed on May 25, 2017, with leave of the Court,
named an additional plaintiff and the sole remaining defendant.
2
For the same reason, the only other pending motion [41] is also denied as moot.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?