State of Mississippi By: Affidavit of Steven Tyler v. Bobo et al

Filing 15

ORDER STAYING CASE. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the aforementioned proceedings are hereby STAYED, pending a ruling on the motion to remand. Defendants shall notify the undersigned magistrate judge within seven (7) days of a decision on the motion to remand and shall submit a proposed order lifting the stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 5/15/18. (bfg)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT    NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI    GREENVILLE DIVISION                    STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BY:    AFFIDAVIT OF STEVEN TYLER     PLAINTIFF         v.         JAMES R. BOBO, et al.     CASE NO.: 4:17-cv-79-DMB-JMV          DEFENDANTS       STAY ORDER STAYING CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS Local Uniform Civil Rule 16(b)(1)(B) provides, “[a] motion to remand . . . will stay the attorney conference and disclosure requirements and all discovery not relevant to the remand … issue … and will stay the parties’ obligation to make disclosures pending the court’s ruling on the motion.” L.U. CIV. R. 16(b)(1)(B) (emphasis added). Because the Defendants have moved to remand this case to state court [14], staying certain proceedings is appropriate. If any party desires to take remand-related discovery, they must file a motion for leave to do so within seven (7) days hereof, setting forth the type and scope of such discovery and an estimated time frame for constructing it. If any party objects to the motion for discovery, it shall file its objection within four (4) days following service of the motion for remand-related discovery. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the aforementioned proceedings are hereby STAYED, pending a ruling on the motion to remand. Defendants shall notify the undersigned magistrate judge within seven (7) days of a decision on the motion to remand and shall submit a proposed order lifting the stay. SO ORDERED this, the 15th day of May, 2018. /s/ Jane M. Virden UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?