Butts et al v. Gunn et al

Filing 94

ORDER STAYING CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 6/28/18. (bfg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI GREENVILLE DIVISION JEFFREY and KIMBERLY BUTTS, et al. PLAINTIFFS VS. CIVIL ACTION NO.: 4:18CV0001-NBB-JMV ROSEMARY AULTMAN, in her official capacity as Chairman of the State Board of Education, ET AL. DEFENDANTS ORDER State Defendants Rosemary Aultman, in her official capacity as Chairman of the State Board of Education, Dr. Carey M. Wright, in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Mississippi Department of Education, Jason Dean, Buddy Bailey, Kami Bumgarner, Karen Elam, Johnny Franklin, William Harold Jones, John Kelly, and Frank McClelland, all in their official capacities a Members of the Mississippi State Board of Education, have moved to dismiss all of the claims asserted against them by the Montgomery County School District in the above-styled case based on a lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. Dkt. Nos. [87, 88]. Under Rule 16(b)(3)(B) of the Uniform Local Rules of the United States District Courts for the Northern and the Southern Districts of Mississippi, “Filing a motion to compel arbitration, or a motion asserting an immunity defense or jurisdictional defense stays the attorney conference and disclosure requirements and all discovery, pending the court’s ruling on the motion, including any appeal.” If any party desires to take jurisdictional-related discovery, they must file a motion for leave to do so within seven (7) days hereof, setting forth the type and scope of such discovery and an estimated time frame for constructing it. If any party objects to the motion for discovery, it shall file its objection 1 within four (4) days following service of the motion for jurisdictional-related discovery. L.U.Civ.R. 16(b)(3)(B). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that conferences, disclosure requirements, discovery, and proceedings in this case should be stayed. Defendants’ counsel shall submit to the undersigned a proposed order lifting the stay, within ten days of notification of the court’s ruling on the underlying dispositive motion. This, the 28th day of June, 2018. __/s/ Jane M. Virden ___________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?