Ford v. Jenkins et al

Filing 28

ORDER denying 27 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 11/26/19. (jla)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI GREENVILLE DIVISION STEVENSON FORD PETITIONER V. NO. 4:18-CV-67-DMB-DAS LEPHER JENKINS, et al. RESPONDENTS ORDER On August 14, 2018, United States Magistrate Judge David A. Sanders issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that Stevenson Ford’s petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed as untimely. Doc. #13. Because this Court did not receive objections from Ford, it reviewed the R&R for clear error and, finding none, dismissed the case with prejudice on January 3, 2019. Docs. #19, #20. Ford subsequently moved for reconsideration on the ground that he mailed objections but that the document was lost in the mail. Docs. #21, #24. This Court, considering the objections timely filed but finding them without substantive merit, denied reconsideration. Doc. #26. Ford subsequently moved for a certificate of appealability. Doc. #27. Rule 11 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Proceedings for the United States District Courts requires a court to “issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it enters a final order adverse to the applicant.” A certificate of appealability (“COA”) will issue “only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). For cases rejected on their merits, a movant “must demonstrate that reasonable jurists would find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong” to warrant a COA. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). To obtain a COA on a claim rejected on procedural grounds, a movant must demonstrate “that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.” Id. at 484. Based on the Slack criteria, the Court, for the reasons set forth in its order denying reconsideration, finds that a COA should not issue in this case. Accordingly, Ford’s motion for a certificate of appealability [27] is DENIED. SO ORDERED, this 26th day of November, 2019. /s/Debra M. Brown UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?