Gray v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
Filing
31
PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 1/10/19. (bfg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
GREENVILLE DIVISION
CHARLENE GRAY
PLAINTIFF
VS.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:18-CV-117-DMB-JMV
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, and
DOES ONE THROUGH FIVE
DEFENDANTS
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
This Stipulation of Confidentiality and Protective Order is submitted to the Court by
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (“Defendant”) and Charlene Gray (“Plaintiff”), by and through their
respective counsel, based on the following facts:
The parties agree that the discovery phase of the above-captioned action may include the
disclosure of material that may be protected under the constitutional, statutory, or common law
rights to privacy. Without waiver of objections to the discoverability of any documents, the
parties intend to provide a mechanism by which discovery of relevant information, otherwise not
objectionable, may be obtained in a manner that protects all parties; including non-parties, and
third parties to this litigation; from the risk of the disclosure of such confidential information.
Documents and information to be designated as “confidential” and produced pursuant to this
protective order fall within the category of material described above.
WHEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between
Defendant and Plaintiff, by and through their respective counsel, that:
1.
Nothing herein shall be deemed either a waiver of any viable objections by
Defendant or Plaintiff to the production of any documents or the right to refuse to produce such
documents based thereon, or admission to the relevancy of the documents requested.
2.
This Protective Order governs the handling of documents, information, and things
(collectively "Information") to the extent that such Information is provided in response to
discovery requests (including documents that are produced by the parties or third persons;
deposition testimony and exhibits and/or portions thereof; responses to interrogatories and
requests for admissions; and any summaries or descriptions of such documents and information)
and is identified by any party, in good faith, as being covered by this Order.
3.
All documents or other information obtained through or in connection with the
course of discovery in this action, including but not limited to, designated deposition testimony
and exhibits, interrogatory responses, responses to requests for admissions, responses to demands
for inspection, documents produced by the parties to this action or by any third party, and any
information obtained therefrom, shall be subject to this Protective Order upon any party's
unilateral and good faith designation of such testimony, written discovery responses, documents,
or other information as "Confidential."
4.
The parties stipulate that any party to this Protective Order may unilaterally and in
good faith designate portions of a deposition transcript as "Confidential," provided such
designation is made on the record during the deposition. Further, any party to this protective
order may unilaterally and in good faith designate written discovery responses, documents, or
other information as "Confidential," provided such designation is stamped on the documents
and/or made in writing concurrently with the provision of such documents, provided further that
with respect to any discovery responses or documents produced before the execution of this
stipulation, any party who has provided such responses or produced such documents may
designate any such discovery responses or documents as confidential hereunder within ten (10)
2
days of notice of the execution of this stipulation by notifying each party in writing of those
discovery responses and documents to be designated as confidential hereunder.
5.
This protective order shall not foreclose any party from moving this Court for an
order finding that the discovery materials bearing the identification specified as
CONFIDENTIAL hereof are not subject to the provisions of this order. The protective order
shall not shift the burden of proof of this motion from the party asserting that the material is
confidential. In the event that one party disputes, in writing, a confidentiality designation by the
other party, the party which designated the material "CONFIDENTIAL" shall have the burden of
timely moving this Court for an order finding that the material is CONFIDENTIAL. Pending the
resolution of such a motion, the material shall continue to be treated as CONFIDENTIAL.
6.
The Information covered by this Order, and any information contained therein,
shall be utilized by the parties solely in their preparation for and the trial of this action, and for
no other purpose.
7.
Except as provided herein, with the express written permission of counsel, or
upon order of the Court, counsel shall not deliver, exhibit or disclose any Information covered by
this Order to any person(s), organization(s) or group(s), except those permitted by Paragraph 8
below, and shall not discuss any such Information, with any person(s), organization(s) or
group(s), except those permitted by Paragraph 8 below. In the event that documents covered
herein are to be disclosed to persons other than counsel and the persons delineated in Paragraphs
8 or 9 below, such persons shall agree to be bound by this stipulation, by certifying that he or she
has carefully read the Protective Order and fully understands its terms and will be bound by its
terms. Counsel making disclosure to any such person shall retain the original executed copy of
3
the declaration. Upon notice of any party of the filing of a motion regarding the disclosure of the
designated confidential information, counsel shall exchange signed disclosure statements
pertaining to such documents.
8.
Testimony, written discovery responses, documents, or other information
designated "Confidential" herein may be used solely in preparation for, and use at, the trial of
this matter, arbitration or mediation, and will be held in strict confidence and shall be disclosed
only to the attorneys of record herein, in-house attorneys, their respective legal assistants and
staff, and any agents, consultants, experts retained for the purposes of this litigation, and the
parties to this action (including, in the case of corporations, officers, directors or employees or
their subsidiaries and affiliates).
9.
The use of any Information designated confidential pursuant to this protective
order in support of any motion, pleading, and/or other paper filed with the Court shall be filed
under seal in compliance with and pursuant to L.U.Civ.R. 79. If a party’s request to file under
seal is denied, then the party may file the information in the public record unless otherwise
instructed by the Court.
10.
Except by written consent of the producing party, each person (other than the
attorneys of record herein, in-house attorneys, their respective legal assistants and staff, and court
personnel) to whom documents or other information designated as "Confidential" may be
disclosed under this Order, prior to the time he or she receives such information in any form
whatsoever, shall be provided with a copy of this Protective Order and shall certify that he or she
has carefully read the Protective order and fully understands its terms and will be bound by its
terms. A copy of the declaration to be executed by each such person is attached hereto as Exhibit
4
A. Counsel making disclosure to any such person shall retain the original executed copy of the
declaration and will make disclosure of such executed declarations to all counsel under the terms
outlined in Paragraph 7 above.
11.
This Stipulation and protective Order shall not be deemed a waiver of:
a.
Any party's right to seek an order compelling discovery with respect to any
discovery request;
b.
Any party's right to object to any discovery or the production of any information
or documents;
c.
Any party's right to object to the admission of any evidence on any
grounds in any proceeding herein; and
d.
Any party's right to use her/his or its own documents with complete
discretion.
12.
Upon final termination of this litigation, including all appeals, the receiving party
shall use commercially reasonable efforts to destroy any confidential documents received,
including all testimony, written discovery responses, documents, and other information received
under the provisions of this Order (including any copies or excerpts thereof).
13.
This Stipulation and Protective Order may be modified by further Order of the
Court, or by agreement of counsel for the parties subject to the approval of the Court, provided
that any such agreement shall be in the form of a written stipulation that is filed with the Clerk of
the Court and made a part of the record in this case.
5
STIPULATED AND AGREED TO:
Dated: 01/04/2019.
CHARLENE GRAY
By: s/ Michael Crawley Steele
Michael Crawley Steele (MSB #100163)
Michael Crawley Steele, PLLC
P. O. Box 1695
Kosciusko, MS 39090
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: 01/07/2019.
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
By: s/ Dorissa S. Smith
Thomas M. Louis (MSB #8484)
Dorissa S. Smith (MSB #104541)
Wells, Marble & Hurst, PLLC
Post Office Box 131
Jackson, MS 39205-0131
tlouis@wellsmarble.com
dsmith@wellsmarble.com
Attorneys for Defendant, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 10, 2019.
By: /s/ Jane M. Virden_____
US Magistrate Judge
6
EXHIBIT A
UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
I hereby state that I have read a copy of the Protective Order in Charlene Gray v. Wal-Mart
Stores East, LP, et. al., Civil Action No. 4:18-cv-117-DMB-JMV, pending in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi, Greenville Division.
I understand its terms and I agree to be bound by its terms.
Dated: ________________
_____________________________
Signature
______________________________
Printed Name
______________________________
Address
7
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?