Foxx v. Brooks
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DIRECTING STATE TO RESPOND, Middle Brooks answer due 12/17/2019., Motions terminated: 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Carlos Foxx.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 10/4/19. (jla)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION
TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND
DIRECTING STATE TO RESPOND
Carlos Foxx has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and seeks
to proceed in forma pauperis. It is ORDERED:
1. That the petitioner’s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED.
2. No later than December 17, 2019, the respondent, through the Attorney General of the
State of Mississippi, must file his answer to this petition, along with full transcripts of all proceedings
in the state courts of Mississippi arising from the charge of attempted armed robbery, armed robbery,
and manslaughter against petitioner in the Circuit Court of Coahma County, Mississippi (to the extent
such transcripts are relevant to the State’s response).
3. Within 14 days of service upon him of a copy of respondent’s answer, petitioner may file
his traverse or reply to the allegations contained in such answer.
4. The clerk of this court will serve by email (Return Receipt, High Importance) a copy of
the petition, this order, acknowledgment of service of process form, and any other initial filings, upon
Jim Hood, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi, or his lawful successor, to Assistant Attorneys
General Jerrolyn Owens and Bridgette Grant. The respondent must electronically file the completed
acknowledgment of service of process form upon receipt.
Petitioner is warned that failure to keep this court informed of his current address could also
lead to dismissal of his lawsuit.
SO ORDERED, this, the 4th day of October, 2019.
/s/ Roy Percy
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?